AHCCCS is proposing changes to the AHCCCS Medical Policy Manual (“AMPM”) that would interfere with guardians’ authority in the decision-making process related to acute care facilities. This change would be unlawful as it is contrary to existing law including the Arizona Administrative Code and the Arizona Revised Statutes. AHCCCS continues to strip guardians’ rights per its AMPM. AHCCCS recently removed the guardian’s authority to alone consent to admission to a behavioral health residential facility (See AMPM 320-V). Thus, a person determined by the Superior Court of Arizona to be unable to make medical decisions is allowed to make medical decisions. Would AHCCCS do this to a person with Alzheimer’s who needs to get into an assisted living facility? No (it does not, the policy is very clear). Would AHCCCS do this to a person with a developmental disability who needs admission to a hospital? No (it does not, the policy is very clear). No, when it comes to consent to medically necessary services, the guardian is cut out only when the member has an SMI. Guardians are appointed by the court based on incapacity, demonstrated need, and least restrictive alternatives. Their legal authority, and their role in caring for SMI persons, should be respected.
Behavioral Health Residential Facility (BHRF) policy
Please comment here on AHCCCS, comment deadline: November 22, 2021
ACMI is asking for families to tell us if you are experiencing any challenges with the behavioral care system. There is a forum on guardianship. You may also tell your story about other issues with the Arizona behavioral health system.
You must register (free) to post in the ACMI forums.
You must be logged in to post a comment.